Chevron Left
Cryptographic Hash and Integrity Protection に戻る

University of Colorado System による Cryptographic Hash and Integrity Protection の受講者のレビューおよびフィードバック

4.5
61件の評価
7件のレビュー

コースについて

Welcome to Cryptographic Hash and Integrity Protection! This course reviews cryptographic hash functions in general and their use in the forms of hash chain and hash tree (Merkle tree). Building on hash functions, the course describes message authentication focusing on message authentication code (MAC) based on symmetric keys. We then discuss digital signatures based on asymmetric cryptography, providing security properties such as non-repudiation which were unavailable in symmetric-cryptography-based message authentication. This course is a part of the Applied Cryptography specialization....

人気のレビュー

SK
2020年6月11日

course is excellent and I hope it would be better if there is an advanced level specialisation continuation for this specialisation

SC
2021年6月1日

Great theory. Professor is also super clear in his explanations.\n\nRecommended :)

フィルター:

Cryptographic Hash and Integrity Protection: 1 - 7 / 7 レビュー

by SAI S K

2020年6月12日

course is excellent and I hope it would be better if there is an advanced level specialisation continuation for this specialisation

by Sebastian C

2021年6月2日

Great theory. Professor is also super clear in his explanations.

Recommended :)

by Adri J J J

2020年5月25日

One of the best courses on hashing in cryptography...

by Mohamed T

2018年6月19日

Excellent course

by Lincoln A

2021年11月29日

This is a very solid course but the "peer grading" requirement needs to be changed. I finished the course on the first or second day of November and had to log on multiple times a day every day until now (Nov 29) to finally get my peer reviews done. The course clearly does not have enough traffic to justify every student doing 3 peer reviews. The requirement should be definitely be reduced - at least to 2 and possibly all the way to one.

by CHITTILLA V V

2018年1月18日

Great course

by Abhinav P

2019年12月15日

Peer reviews take way longer than expected.