PV
2019年11月21日
The course was simple and crisp yet covered it all - interaction, visual and usability. Liked the duration of the videos followed by reading material that covered the highlights of the topic.
NS
2016年3月16日
The basic principles of design and their philosophies were covered well in this course, and it was taught in a quick, efficient manner. I liked undergoing this course and would recommend it.
by Sanjay M
•2020年4月20日
The course is designed well. Need more details on Chi-squared and AB testing. Overall it is very informative and helpful. Thank you
by priyank a
•2019年4月9日
If you do not have experience with data analysis (specifically speaking Pearson's chi square technique), you might struggle like me.
by Bruno T B
•2017年7月3日
Good course. The leactures could be better structured, but with some complementary reading and insistence, you bust right through.
by Les F
•2016年12月16日
Great, if brief course. Some occasionally ill-worded test questions. But this course piqued my interest for the ones that follow.
by Catherine B
•2017年12月31日
Just in week 1, this course has me examining and evaluating things I normally would take for granted...including work arounds!
by Jess C
•2016年5月16日
Overall it was mostly good but the maths was not well enough explained and some of the course materials felt out of date.
by Maria G P
•2016年5月30日
Some of the evaluation methods just allow other people how doesn't do to much work to just pass...
by Barnali
•2017年6月13日
A very good learning course. The content could be more in depth to get a better understanding.
by Walter L
•2016年4月4日
The first assignment was very confusing in terms of what was required, and it should be fixed.
by Abdulelelah M
•2016年3月17日
Everything is great apart of the third week assignment. I guess it needs to be changed.
by Manny O
•2016年9月24日
Gave basic introduction to design principles but the assignments were very engaging
by Leah N
•2018年1月16日
The course overall was good but the assignment instructions were not clear enough
by Joel W
•2016年1月6日
very good course! the final was much more logical than the first course
by Darren G
•2016年5月16日
This course really helped me understand what to ask of my Design team!
by Jacob T K
•2016年1月15日
Lectures are clear and extensively cited; assignments are interesting.
by Ahasanul B H
•2019年9月17日
Informative course..Thank you professor and coursera.
by Alexander S
•2015年9月28日
Good explanation of few design ideas and technics.
by Dave G
•2016年1月26日
Another very good class in this specialization.
by Cibele B d C
•2015年9月10日
Really good introduction to interactive design
by Viebone
•2016年4月26日
good tips for testing experiments
by Shriman G
•2020年7月30日
Very interesting course
by Emily s
•2016年7月31日
Interesting materials.
by Miguel C
•2015年8月19日
I like it!
by Jaime F V
•2016年8月30日
This course as much content in it and it's difficult to have an holistic idea how it all fits together. Some videos are taught having the same problem like, for example, some tools/themes are presented without us knowing what they are for. E.g., Chi-squared test and null hypothesis. Only after a while we understand their use. This bring a lot of overhead to us who are learning.
Some videos seem to have been re-worked over time and present cuts or jumps.
As for assignments, they should be better worked because some questions are not clear or misleading regarding the criteria that you want to evaluate.
For example, I already reported that in Question 2. and 3. of the assignment for the 3rd week. The example you give is a short introduction with two problems: 1) "I did the website", which can make the participant not to be at ease to criticize and 2) we're no evaluating the participant performance but the website. Next, you ask us to rewrite the introduction, which we do with those two problems in mind. Now, when we do the peer review we realize that you're expecting for us to rate the new introduction based on having "early prototype" and "user feedback". The original problems just seem not to count. Only by chance you can eventually write the new introduction touching the points that count for grading.
by Gioconda B
•2017年10月16日
I like the content of the course. I feel I have learned a lot, especially working with the Chi Squared test. However, there was an example that was not clear on week 3 – Comparing rates. The example refers to comparing two buttons in a home page in order to improve traffic. The data provided was confusing because the Instructor refers that 118 people sign up the “learn more” button over a week. He calculates the chi squared value with 118 sign-ups for the “learn more” button. Then he said that 119 people sign up over a week for the same button, and he calculates the chi square value with this data. My suggestion is to review that video. Thank you.