Good course! There is just one thing I would improve here - an explanation of the mistakes after the tests are done. This improvement should increase the student`s understanding of specific topics.
This course was a very good sum up of Daniel Kahneman's thinking fast and slow. Definitely recommend to everyone who would like to know more about our flaws or would like to refresh your knowledge.
by Karan L•
week 2 is too long , can split it and have more interaction with videos and a quiz and finally get some answers to the quizes once solved to get a thorough understanding like in week 1
by Nguyen T T•
It lacks of video lectures so I had to rely on notes only. The course's content is interesting and has potential to give learner more depth of topics. Hope it will be improved soon.
by Kalpesh D•
Different bias should be explained and then put in the quiz. 2. Videos were explaining what the reading material only. No new learning. 3. More simple examples should be added.
by Aniruddha O•
Useful course but explanation for answers to the quiz questions could have been much better. Quiz questions do not always seem to be based on concepts covered in the course.
by Pablo C N•
The lectures are very friendly and clear but they lack the detail to learn the minutia related to all the behavious, heuristics and biases associated with the subject
by Chaitanya T•
Informative yet the presentation of the course material could have been much better in order to suite all classes of individuals(coming from a non-finance background).
by Eduardo J K•
É uma boa introdução a alguns temas da área. Trata-se de um curso curto, sem muitos aprofundamentos, mas que é útil para aqueles que desejam iniciar seus estudos.
by DHIRAJ J•
Theory should have been more elaborate,quizzes should not be concentrating on one aspect viz asset bubble 7 questions.
We have to refer many books,internet etc.
by Markus R•
Very interesting topic and great instructors.
Unfortunately, many things were not covered by video lectures. It often felt like there were parts missing.
by Sayan D G•
A very interesting course, but it needs to be made more exhaustive in terms of explanations and lecture coverage. Definitely helps meet my objectives.
by Sathyajith M 1•
While the content is interesting, having the videos deal with more content and reducing the reading material would make it a lot more accessible .
Teach me 鱼 in videos；
by Rafael W•
The lectures dont cover all the subjects discussed.
I would be delighted to listen to lectures about economic bubbles and non rational behavior.
by Aditya B•
There is a lot( A LOT) of reading. Though content is very good. Would have been better if more of the reading part was explained in videos.
by Gerald S•
I feel the course needs more scaffolding and further explanation of the abstract concepts to gain further understanding before the quizzes.
by Marai C W•
I think this course is great as an introduction to behavioral finance, however I think the content lacks depth and is rather superficial.
by Ute O•
Would definitely need detailed answers to questions, esp after the quizzes. Week one was great, but struggled with Weeks 2 and esp. 3.
by Mingtong S•
Covered a broad spectrum of topic, but didn't go in-depth, which makes assignments very difficult and extra work necessary
by Ishita D•
Its really nice to learn about this as it helps investors in making decisions after considering their irrational behaviour
by Vanchhit R•
The course is well designed, especially the case study examples. However, exercise questions are not that clear.
by Ali A•
Video material was not sufficient, some quiz questions were not mentioned neither in the reading nor lectures
by Venkat C•
Good concepts but the lectures were a bit 'all over the place'. No as structured as I would have expected.
by Lori C•
Basic introduction to Behavioral Finance - mostly application of terms on exams that did not tie to lect
by Fernando R•
A more in depth course would be great. this barely scratches the surface. but as an intro it works well.
by Kelsey S•
Valuable information but the quizzes lack clarity and explanation. Would suggest auditing if anything.