May 02, 2017
Very interesting! One missing thing: please write explanations for correct/incorrect questions in quizzes. In the basic course, I found them very helpful in understanding why my reasoning was wrong.
Sep 11, 2016
Outstanding course on Game Theory. Provides excellent mathematical and logical treatment of the concepts and theory. A perfect stepping stone for researchers willing to pursue their research in Gam
by Jie He•
Apr 16, 2019
This course could be better in many ways. However, I really appreciate the efforts the professors made to put up so much information into this short course. It opens many new worlds for me in the universe of game theory, and in particular, the Arrow's theorem is so astonishing that it almost refreshed my thinking on the mechanisms of voting.
by Lucas Florençano de Castro Monteiro•
Mar 10, 2019
The professors are great!
I think the students would profit more if there were more exercises to track their learning.
I had some difficulties because sometimes it requires an advanced level in math which I don't have.
Eventhough, I could enjoy and acquire some valuable skills.
Mar 06, 2019
Maybe harder than I, but obviously, more useful.
by ZHU SHANJUN•
Jan 11, 2019
The lecture are useful and the lecturer clear in their content and delivery. However, it would be better if more practices with answers can be given, and the tutorial should include questions of greater difficulty, such as those with real game settings and rules to solve for optimum strategy.
by Ashish kumar•
Jan 10, 2019
Brilliant mind-teaser, helps you form skills that will lead to logical thinking in strategic interplays between everyday events and even the more complex one.
by Runyang Wang•
Jan 08, 2019
by Koa Yoshihara•
Jan 04, 2019
Great course, I was really overdue but am hoping to get a certificate if possible
by Mohammad Zarghami•
Sep 09, 2018
poorly explained lectures. you're better off reading a textbook
by Diogo Costa•
Jul 01, 2018
Better than the first course. The topics were less familiar to me, so it opened a few more doors.I still feel like the math was neglected, most of the time. I don't expect every derivation, but at least an acknowledgement of where the formulas come from if one wants to derive them himself.The graded quizzes should have provided an explanation of the correct answers, I think. Sometimes that explanation made everything clearer to me (when I got the correct by mistake or by simple elimination).I really appreciate the reading material! At least I can now follow the subject more in-depth if I want, so that's very welcome.Overall, still feels like a fairly light overview, but it's a good introduction to the subjects of mechanism design and auctions, I feel.
by Mariano Bernal Padró•
May 30, 2018
Excellent! i think it shall contain more realistic examples for mechanism development and auctions