Chevron Left
Back to Application of Health Equity Research Methods for Practice and Policy

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Application of Health Equity Research Methods for Practice and Policy by Johns Hopkins University

4.9
stars
41 ratings

About the Course

Intended for students who have completed the introduction to health equity research course and/or have previous experience working in this area. This course will cover innovative methods, practical tools, and skills required to conduct rigorous health equity research and translate evidence-based strategies into practice and policy. Covers topics ranging from conceptual frameworks for stakeholder engagement and behavioral intervention development, to adapting interventions for socially-at-risk populations, and research methods in healthcare services and social epidemiology....

Top reviews

DB

Sep 3, 2021

Excellent course, the instructors are very deailed and concise. I look forward to applying heath Equity reserach methods into study design strategy &implementation.

NZ

Mar 25, 2021

I would really appreciate it if I had this opportunity to benefit from this practical course entitled "Application of Health Equity Research Methods".

Filter by:

1 - 10 of 10 Reviews for Application of Health Equity Research Methods for Practice and Policy

By Hope L

•

Aug 20, 2020

I enjoyed this course as achieving health care equity and ensuring access to care to marginalized populations is important to address. This course provides examples of how to implement health equity research methods to impact change in institutional policies and practices. Highly recommend.

By Aedrian A

•

Feb 17, 2022

This is an excellent follow-up to the Foundations of Health Equity Research course by the same instructors and institution. While some of the concepts are definitely not unheard of, the way they integrate well to the overarching goal of promoting health equity is quite new to me. I was also able to acknowledge better the challenges, in terms of research infrastructure and health disparities, in my local context. While all five modules are interesting and well-made, my favorite take-aways from this offering are those involving research and interventions related to health literacy. For people from developing nations who are interested to conduct endeavors on health equity promotion in their own setting, I think that this material can serve as a model to realize such goals.

By Roxane G

•

Mar 10, 2021

I enjoyed the comprehensive approach to research including hiring a research staff.

By sheron B

•

Jan 26, 2023

I enjoy the course It provide me with a lot of statistical

information that had not been fully aware of. The reading material, videos, and of course the knowledge checks gave me a lot of insight into the policies and procedures, and how to research and set up a barrier analysis for tracking SDOH factors.

By Abiodun J o

•

Oct 1, 2020

i enjoyed the application of health equity research methods for practice and policy.The videos presentation,book review and its application towards justice,equity and cultural language barriers were exceptional.

By Dr. R D B

•

Sep 4, 2021

Excellent course, the instructors are very deailed and concise. I look forward to applying heath Equity reserach methods into study design strategy &implementation.

By negar y z

•

Mar 26, 2021

I would really appreciate it if I had this opportunity to benefit from this practical course entitled "Application of Health Equity Research Methods".

By ABDULLAH H

•

Jun 4, 2021

.......................................................................................................

By Deleted A

•

Oct 30, 2022

Excellent materials to consider when working in the area of research

By Sandra A

•

Aug 18, 2022

I think it iwas a good general class. I expected more details about sampling methodology, but the background and history why health equity has been challenging is critical for creating the contextual conditions for change. The lecturers were good. Maybe there could have been less emphasis on hiring staff. It is iportant, but I think other areas could have been focused on a little more.