エコール・ポリテクニーク（École Polytechnique） による How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) の受講者のレビューおよびフィードバック
コースについて
人気のレビュー
TD
2021年11月20日
I really liked the course and the contents are great. Except for the language problem, everything else is very good, and really enjoyed learning from peers and instructors. Thank you for the platform.
SM
2020年4月11日
The content was very good and explanation was excellent just there was a slight problem with instructors accent but don't worry you will get used to it no time but the course is excellent and helpful
How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course)： 776 - 800 / 828 レビュー
by Dr. V B K
•2020年10月3日
very good course
by Sasimaporn S
•2020年4月16日
Nice course ever
by Mursalin N
•2020年12月20日
It was helpful.
by NUR L S B M R
•2020年6月25日
it was so fun
by Jomar N
•2020年11月3日
great course
by Prabha S (
•2020年5月24日
Great Course
by GISHA G
•2020年4月28日
Nice course
by Fardin F K
•2020年6月4日
Good One
by Jaime A
•2017年3月20日
Great!
by MAYUR K
•2020年5月11日
Great
by DABBIRU G S C 1
•2021年3月1日
good
by SIVA K M
•2020年11月3日
good
by Vikash K G
•2020年8月15日
Mast
by Sana s
•2020年7月19日
nice
by Maysyara S
•2020年6月21日
good
by ANAND
•2020年5月16日
nice
by Shashwati T
•2020年5月6日
Good
by Sriram.v
•2020年4月9日
GOOD
by Wassef M
•2022年4月16日
.
by Vijai K S
•2020年9月12日
It is okay. It doesn't help the researchers in the things they need the most. I would recommend following Prof. Kristin Sainani's course on "Writing in the sciences" if someone actually wants to learn to write a paper. Although the grading system here is like a barter system where you have to beg around in forums to get your writeups graded and you receive almost no feedback at all. People simply press whatever number they feel like. It seems like this is where coursera is heading since this seems to be a common pattern in some of the non technical courses.
by Robin O
•2017年8月3日
It's a good course, especially if you go through the extra readings at the end of each module, loads to learn there. The English pronunciation of the teachers can be a bit confusing sometimes, because they are native French speakers. Sometimes the descriptions of the tasks don't appear until after you submit a task, which makes it difficult to reach 100%. And the deadlines can be difficult to reach, because the peer reviews can take too much time.
by Lorna
•2016年7月11日
Me pareció un buen curso introductorio a lo que es la investigación, lo recomiendo ampliamente a estudiantes de preparatoria y primer año de universidad, mas allá de esos estudios, solo lo recomendaría para repasar conceptos muy básicos. Una cosa que no me agrado fue el mal ingles, es inentendible sin los subtitulos, por lo que si alguien quiere hacer este curso y repasar el idioma no creo que le sirva de mucho. Por lo demás todo muy bien.
by Deleted A
•2017年6月15日
Would have been significantly better if the course was taught in the native language (French) and then someone fluent in both languages translated. A lot of words were misused or undecipherable because the speakers were not using the language correctly.
Still, the material was helpful and I benefited from the course.
by Príscila A d C
•2016年4月17日
A good course who teaches the way you have to do to write correctly a scientific paper, and gives an idea about the process of publish, it is useful and necessary for those who wants to continuous study and have their own work knows on the fields who works and research.
by Alexander D
•2020年9月29日
Spent one evening to pass all the course. Overly simplistic. Questions after videos are self evident and don't require watching videos. Frankly, I strongly doubt that people passing this course I will succeed in writing peer-reviewed papers.
Coursera Footer
