カリフォルニア大学サンディエゴ校 による Molecular Evolution (Bioinformatics IV) の受講者のレビューおよびフィードバック
コースについて
人気のレビュー
DD
2019年10月23日
Yet another course in this series with really high quality content. If you want to learn something about bioinformatics, you're in the right place.
RG
2017年7月19日
Covers the most important algorithms for phylogenetic trees. Fascinating exam
Molecular Evolution (Bioinformatics IV)： 1 - 19 / 19 レビュー
by 龔峰榆
•2019年10月20日
The two professors are really excellent teachers. It's a pity that I have to quit the course for some reason, so I only finish 88%. But I'll be back someday. Good luck to you all !
by Daniel D
•2019年10月24日
Yet another course in this series with really high quality content. If you want to learn something about bioinformatics, you're in the right place.
by Robert G
•2017年7月20日
Covers the most important algorithms for phylogenetic trees. Fascinating exam
by Pavel O
•2021年3月31日
Good course for improving algorithmic skills and keep learning something new
by Zack X
•2019年7月21日
In depth and comprehensive coverage of the topics in genetic data analysis.
by Samuel C
•2018年8月17日
Fascinating material, and excellently presented!
by Arun P
•2017年5月9日
It was an excellent & informative course !
by Edgardo P F J
•2021年9月16日
Challenging but fun course!
by Yulan W
•2016年10月2日
very useful!
by Yasmine E H
•2020年7月27日
Interesting
by Saif A
•2022年5月27日
👌🏻👌🏻
by Weidong X
•2016年10月30日
good.
by 박준형 / 학 / 컴
•2018年9月15日
.
by Christiane A
•2017年11月6日
Good course material and challenging code problems!
Onde remark : the peer review was almost impossible to correct because the diagrams (trees) where of such lpoor quality that the numvers where almost completely unreadable!
by Ari B
•2016年12月5日
At some point several instructors lost necessary passion to keep us focused. Otherwise it was a very informed and enjoyable presentation. Historical references are extremely important.
by Hercules P N
•2017年8月15日
Although certain aspects of it were positive and in line with the quality of previous modules, this course had its problems. The biggest was the lack of alignment between weeks 4 and 5 (which would be better placed in Module 2) and the rest of it. It got worse due to the lack of Stepik support and material in the textbooks that would in theory accompany the course. This misalignment is also evident when we look at the quizzes and the final challenge, which hardly tackled the material of those two dreadful weeks.
by Bryan G
•2016年8月15日
I would have enjoyed it more if I had had enough knowledge to do the Honors quiz!
I downloaded all the videos so I could play them over without chewing up my data, but the quality is so poor you can't always make out the writing - i's and j's all look similar. It would be better if the presentation material was bigger and the facilitator images smaller - you need only see a face, not the whole upper body in the foreground.
Nevertheless, I have been enlightened !
by ZIHAN X
•2019年5月4日
The contents of last two weeks are very obscure. Without interactive text, it's very difficult to comprehend by watching short videos.
by Ho Y C
•2019年7月28日
The programming assignments are difficult
Coursera Footer
