This is one of the Best Course available on Reinforcement Learning. I have gone through various study material but the depth and practical knowledge given in the course is awesome.
At times it felt like a bit more video material would be helpful to better understand the subject/gain deeper understanding.\n\nAnd fixing some of the notebooks would be helpful.
by Xiaoahe X•
The course is well organized. Reference and extra learning items is helpful to enhance the knowledge.
BUT! There are so many small bugs in the assignments that it really takes time to fix and make the course hard to get passed.
by Helmut G•
Sometimes it is hard to understand/follow the instructors. And the assignments (especially the grader) are bit too much beta, which causes a lot of extra effort.
by Felix A•
The course itself is great, but the assignments are a bit chaotic (so make sure to bring a lot of patience and willingness to bugfix)
Lectures are mathematical and theoretical.
Assignments are practical. NO EXPLANATION OF WHAT ASSIGNMENTS IN CLASS
by Dai T•
Lots of theory and definition should be illustrate in detail on ppt.
by Sylvain D•
by Anders A•
The collection of curriculum was great together with links to external resources. However, there was several weaknesses with the course. First, several of the assignments had problems with submitting the code, which required some extra coding to be able to submit assignment. Event with multiple weeks with many students reporting the problem, nothing was corrected. Second, the lectures were weak. I knew something about Q-learning from before, but after the lecture I was more confused than when I started. The topics I were not familiar from before the course,I ended up searching online or using the resources linked to instead of the lectures. The question exercises felt arbitrary and not helpful at all. The programming exercises were not well explained. I were able to finish them, but to much unnecessary annoyance.
by Maxim B•
Don't let Alexander Panin read lectures. He is an awful speaker: always in a hurry, uses so many redundant words in his speech. He "killed" so much interesting material in this course. I truly believe he could write cool lecture notes and handouts (currently the course lacks it). Alexander, please, write materials, don't read lectures.
by Raghu R•
Course is good. But too many grader issues. Accent is tough to understand sometimes. The concept is not built layer wise..Instead they dump it as a heap with tough jargon which had to broken down to be understood slowly by pausing..
by Arun A•
Instructors are difficult to understand. Assignment directions are not clear
by Antony L•
Course not ready and has installation prerequisites. Seems to use a libraries (Docker, Env).
I waste too much of my time trying to install libraries and dependencies for online courses, most of which become obsolete within a year or two.
Additionally, the logic embedded within the library is often the thing I want to learn, and abstracting it only teaches me about the bugs and shortcomings of that library.