Chevron Left
Principles of Secure Coding に戻る

カリフォルニア大学デービス校(University of California, Davis) による Principles of Secure Coding の受講者のレビューおよびフィードバック

4.3
115件の評価
30件のレビュー

コースについて

This course introduces you to the principles of secure programming. It begins by discussing the philosophy and principles of secure programming, and then presenting robust programming and the relationship between it and secure programming. We'll go through a detailed example of writing robust code and we'll see many common programming problems and show their connection to writing robust, secure programs in general. We’ll examine eight design principles that govern secure coding and how to apply them to your own work. We’ll discuss how poor design choices drive implementation in coding. We’ll differentiate between informal, formal, and ad hoc coding methods. Throughout, methods for improving the security and robustness of your programs will be emphasized and you will have an opportunity to practice these concepts through various lab activities. A knowledge of the C programming language is helpful, but not required to participate in the lab exercises....

人気のレビュー

SJ

Sep 03, 2019

Matt Bishop is an excellent Secure Coding Trainer. I enjoyed the sessions all the way and it was totally engaging with practical examples.

SS

Feb 17, 2020

The course was an exceptional one. And helped me to lot to understand what Robust and Secure coding really means. Thank you so much tutor.

フィルター:

Principles of Secure Coding: 26 - 31 / 31 レビュー

by SATHYA S

May 26, 2020

Concepts clearly explained.

by Mr. J H

Jun 05, 2020

Good Course

by Pranjal G

Feb 21, 2020

Good one

by Hassan M

May 17, 2020

I think the course quality is good as an introduction to secure coding and building a foundation for future studies. However, it appears that there is no active teacher assistant monitoring the course as a question that I asked several weeks ago is still unanswered. The instructors would need active monitoring to improve the course quality.

by MD B

Mar 02, 2020

0

by David G

Jun 21, 2020

Way too much material, lectures move way too slow, teacher goes into excessive detail in the wrong places