Nicholas. Welcome back. Hi. It's good to be back. And it's a great honor that former Wineburg Prize winner, Professor Nicholas Ponta has chosen our university to continue his research on protein-protein interactions. And in addition to that, Professor Ponta will also lead a select number of excellent students in the Ponta talent class. Ladies and gentlemen, Nicholas Ponta! We all know that scientific research boils down to one thing. At the end of the project we know everything about nothing or next to nothing. But there are some rare moments in one's career when you discover something which will surprise the world. When I looked at the printouts of the data on that specific Wednesday morning, yes, back then, all the data was still on paper. That's when I knew we've found something. We no longer know everything about nothing but something very important, a better understanding of how partner proteins diffuse and consequently bind each other in the cell and if there's anything that I would like. Sorry for interrupting professor, but did you really discover this yourself? I mean, did you really personally make this discovery, this ingenious world changing discovery? Sir, if you would be so kind, if you just let. This is discovery really originate from your own mind? That smells good. Nice. What is it? Sauteed veal brains. You said you liked it. For eating his mind, you thought like that. Yeah. Well, that's the question, can a cow think? Yeah. Good question. Philosophically speaking, yes. Scientifically speaking, no. Well, philosophy is a science. If it's a good question philosophically speaking, it's a good question scientifically speaking. No, no, no, no. Come on. Philosophy isn't a science. No, not a real science. Philosophers boast that the scientific practice consists of asking questions and if they happen to stumble upon an answer they find that a trivial detail, they ask questions. Wow. Science is about knowing things, and in order to discover these things you need to ask questions, good questions. And a good question is determined in the way it can be answered. Science revolves around the question, 'How one can establish something as true?' Okay. So, if philosophy isn't a science, then what is? Mathematics? Of course. Physics? Does a bear shit in the woods? And history? Yes. Well, no. Why not? Look, history is not reproducible. You can't control the variables. Most experiments are about knowing everything about almost nothing. You describe history. Scientific discovery is history. Physicists make history but So you say that historical investigation, for example, on the resuscitation experiment which was performed in a way that was ethically and politically incorrect, historical investigation, which I happen to have been doing for over the last year, you say that's total bullshit. No. No. I didn't say that. It's not bullshit. But it ain't science either. Well, most of the university thinks it is. Yeah. But most Wineburg prize winners in this room think it isn't. Well, it's how you asked your question, the way you structure your question. Well, then so whether it's total bullshit or not. Then, I shall structure my following question scientifically. Was that guy that's gotten right this afternoon and why did you not answer his question? Because I truly hope it wasn't because he was right. "Oh, no.", you would say. "He couldn't be right because it wasn't a properly formulated hypothesis." But isn't asking a question simply stating a hypothesis? Or is that getting too philosophical for you?