Chevron Left
Back to RStudio for Six Sigma - Monte Carlo Simulation

Learner Reviews & Feedback for RStudio for Six Sigma - Monte Carlo Simulation by Coursera Project Network

4.1
stars
20 ratings

About the Course

In this 2-hour long project-based course, you will learn how to 1. Generate Continuous, Discrete and Categorical Data (Xs) Using Statistical Distributions 2. Create A Transfer Function That Relates The Xs With The Y (Dependent Variable) 3. Perform Monte Carlo Simulation & Sensitivity Analysis Using RStudio Note: This course works best for learners who are based in the North America region. We’re currently working on providing the same experience in other regions....

Top reviews

Filter by:

1 - 8 of 8 Reviews for RStudio for Six Sigma - Monte Carlo Simulation

By Krutika I

•

Apr 13, 2021

Great instructor. I am a beginner in R studio and yet I was able to understand the concepts and build strong foundations of this topic. With little more practice, I will be able to apply the concepts from this projects in my job. Thank you!

By Alan D P

•

Jan 20, 2022

Good for starting learning in RStudio to more practical applications.

By Haslan

•

Feb 28, 2021

Very good introduction to Monte Carlo Simulation.

By Soloshenko M A

•

Dec 19, 2021

perfect

By Kupka O

•

Mar 20, 2022

Project is excellent, data from this project is absent by given link:((

By Ruben V

•

Jul 12, 2023

I find the course to be interesting, but it is disappointing that the virtual cloud platform was not accessible for an adequate amount of time to complete the exercises. I was unable to fully watch the instructions before the virtual cloud space was shut down, and I was unable to download any of the course material.

By ABHAY S S

•

Jun 1, 2021

Instructor has good teaching skills but the content is not enough to spark any interest. The functions use in R are not easily available. Please provide alternatives to them.

By imran p

•

Sep 18, 2023

poor quality, materials are not available, limited time to work on actual project. details are vague instead of being descriptive