Chevron Left
Game Theory II: Advanced Applications に戻る

スタンフォード大学(Stanford University) による Game Theory II: Advanced Applications の受講者のレビューおよびフィードバック



Popularized by movies such as "A Beautiful Mind", game theory is the mathematical modeling of strategic interaction among rational (and irrational) agents. Over four weeks of lectures, this advanced course considers how to design interactions between agents in order to achieve good social outcomes. Three main topics are covered: social choice theory (i.e., collective decision making and voting systems), mechanism design, and auctions. In the first week we consider the problem of aggregating different agents' preferences, discussing voting rules and the challenges faced in collective decision making. We present some of the most important theoretical results in the area: notably, Arrow's Theorem, which proves that there is no "perfect" voting system, and also the Gibbard-Satterthwaite and Muller-Satterthwaite Theorems. We move on to consider the problem of making collective decisions when agents are self interested and can strategically misreport their preferences. We explain "mechanism design" -- a broad framework for designing interactions between self-interested agents -- and give some key theoretical results. Our third week focuses on the problem of designing mechanisms to maximize aggregate happiness across agents, and presents the powerful family of Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanisms. The course wraps up with a fourth week that considers the problem of allocating scarce resources among self-interested agents, and that provides an introduction to auction theory. You can find a full syllabus and description of the course here: There is also a predecessor course to this one, for those who want to learn or remind themselves of the basic concepts of game theory: An intro video can be found here:



This was a wonderful and very mathematically intensive course, but completing all the quizzes gave a great sense of accomplishment and developed my understanding of game theory and its various facets.


Very interesting! One missing thing: please write explanations for correct/incorrect questions in quizzes. In the basic course, I found them very helpful in understanding why my reasoning was wrong.


Game Theory II: Advanced Applications: 76 - 97 / 97 レビュー

by Matthew W


A lot of the important results were covered but sometimes results came out of nowhere (for example with optimal auctions and virtual valuations).

by R.Athindran


Overall, the course was good. Somehow, the concepts were not as clear as the basic game theory course. Definitely more advanced.

by Ryan B


A good class with a good formal description and examples of game theoretic concepts.

by Koa Y


Great course, I was really overdue but am hoping to get a certificate if possible

by Affandi I


Great course, but I think It could be more vivid like its predecessor

by Roland R


Great Course, same parts are challenging but i learned a lot about

by Hushan J


it's better to give explanations of the quiz when it is passed.

by Daniel A M S


It was nice to have a second part with more specific subjects.

by Arshia S


This course gave me amazing insight into game theory.

by Muhua X


It is very challenging but also interesting

by carlo p


Excellent skills obtained

by Mufizul I


Very nice

by Fred V


Auction theory is left to the last lecture, and the influence of voting systems on political mechanisms is barely addressed. 3 different people lecturing, with different communication skills and flaws (hesitations, over-notating, abuse of acronyms), make following the course more difficult than it needs to be. These being said, it is clear that the authors more than know their stuff (at least the theoretical part; we would like to see them perform when bargaining in a souk) and bring a lot into the course.

by Cigdem K


The exams did not explain why the wrong answers are wrong. Even after you succeed a test, I expect an explanation of the questions, and the correct answers. Even if I have a correct answer to a question, I don't know if my reasoning is correct..

by Telmo J P P


Interesting, but not as good as part I. Some parts of the syllabus were not explained well enough: a lot of results just come out of thin air, and not a lot of intuitions are given.

by Emil


Diverse course, which covered various topics. For the election processes however one could some illegal practices, which also could lead to a win. A democratic win...

by Martín B


Should have much more real examples. Voting schemes was right, but mechanism design was completely abstract

by Carlos F S T


No es tan bueno como el primero. Sin embargo, tomarlo como continuación es interesante.

by Jeppe v P


Interesting material, but sometimes hard to follow the lectures.

by Edmund L


The beginning of this course was interesting much like Game Theory I, but the latter half of the course went over my head. It would have been helpful if problem sets and exam are given explanations after submission similar to how it was done in Game Theory I. Sometimes I have no idea how particular answers are obtained.

by Prabhupad B


No proper explanations were given for any of the assignment questions, and also, in the lectures, the examples were missing. The course needs a significant improvement in terms of the content

by Mohammad Z


poorly explained lectures. you're better off reading a textbook