Chevron Left
Functional Program Design in Scala に戻る

スイス連邦工科大学ローザンヌ校(École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) による Functional Program Design in Scala の受講者のレビューおよびフィードバック

4.5
3,051件の評価
521件のレビュー

コースについて

In this course you will learn how to apply the functional programming style in the design of larger Scala applications. You'll get to know important new functional programming concepts, from lazy evaluation to structuring your libraries using monads. We'll work on larger and more involved examples, from state space exploration to random testing to discrete circuit simulators. You’ll also learn some best practices on how to write good Scala code in the real world. Finally, you will learn how to leverage the ability of the compiler to infer values from types. Several parts of this course deal with the question how functional programming interacts with mutable state. We will explore the consequences of combining functions and state. We will also look at purely functional alternatives to mutable state, using infinite data structures or functional reactive programming. Recommended background: You should have at least one year programming experience. Proficiency with Java or C# is ideal, but experience with other languages such as C/C++, Python, Javascript or Ruby is also sufficient. You should have some familiarity with using the command line. This course is intended to be taken after Functional Programming Principles in Scala: https://www.coursera.org/learn/progfun1....

人気のレビュー

RP
2016年9月14日

This is a university degree course which takes enormous effort to complete. But still its beond the programming course range giving you whats not possible to google or learn practical way. Thanks!

ES
2018年3月17日

Thank you for this exciting course! I did the FP in Scala course a few years ago and decided to do the full certification now. I am looking forward to the next courses in the specialisation.

フィルター:

Functional Program Design in Scala: 476 - 500 / 506 レビュー

by Ivan K

2018年4月8日

Last (4th week) is awfully designed, includes a lot of "scratch the surface" material, very bad explanations of futures and background. With authors redesigned 4th week.

by Pavel O

2020年1月21日

Some stuff was weird, like the quickcheck task, too much weird syntax, hard to understand what's going on, especially because there was no explanation for binomial heap

by Oleg O

2017年6月23日

Weird mix of disorganized materials. Manner of teaching of Erik Meijer is really annoying. Course "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" was much better

by Pascal S

2016年11月27日

Learned quite a bit, but course was not as good as the first course of the specialization.

Especially the presentations in week 4 are rather messy.

by David P

2017年1月5日

Thoroughly enjoyed the lectures by M. Odersky! Unfortunately the lectures on Futures seemed a bit disconnected from the rest of the material...

by Santiago S L

2018年10月12日

Course is fine from an "standard" industry standpoint. However, I would have loved more monads and harder concepts related to category theory.

by Fernando G

2016年7月13日

Interesting, but a little bit too easy and shallow.

The material was reused from other courses without making it all fit together well.

by Nathan L

2016年10月13日

Was quite good but getting less and less useful, too abstract, lacking detail. Examples too academic, needs to be more practical.

by Alfonso M F

2016年12月19日

Week 3 assigment had little relationship with the material presented in the course. Week 4 needs quite a lot of polish...

by Yuan L

2017年2月16日

The last week has materials that nothing related to assignment, and it jumps a bit fast where i have no clue at all

by Nicolas C

2016年6月1日

Most of the content was included in Functional Programming in Scala and Reactive Programming Principles in Scala.

by Bidhya N S

2019年4月2日

The course is not structured well. Also concepts like monads and functors are not covered in detailed way.

by David S

2016年12月20日

Meh. Very basic intro; not the more advanced class I anticipated, based on the first in the sequence.

by Damien F

2016年12月3日

The videos were a bit confusing and gave me the impression that it was a patchwork from old lectures.

by Peter H

2018年12月30日

Course material seems to be combined from two old courses, and some materials are not well prepared.

by Roger L

2017年8月9日

The examples & exercises were too academic. Just glad to complete it. Found it extremely dull.

by Mayeul M

2016年9月5日

Not as useful as the first course. The part on the futures is not really understandable.

by yassine a

2017年11月3日

not bad , but very short and not huge plus value compared to first course

by Gabriele A

2019年10月1日

Good course but not much coherence between lessons and exercises.

by mostafa n

2017年4月29日

nice course but i was expecting more about actors and futures

by Andrew Z

2016年9月5日

The main difficulty of the task does not apply to the course

by Bert H

2016年10月6日

Course material looked sometimes recycled and unstructered

by Chang F

2016年12月5日

Not as good as the first one, esp near the end.

by Sergey S

2016年12月17日

progfun and reactive programming was better

by Kuba F

2016年9月24日

Worse than Scala Principles - too chaotic.