Sep 15, 2016
This is a university degree course which takes enormous effort to complete. But still its beond the programming course range giving you whats not possible to google or learn practical way. Thanks!
Mar 18, 2018
Thank you for this exciting course! I did the FP in Scala course a few years ago and decided to do the full certification now. I am looking forward to the next courses in the specialisation.
by James T•
Aug 24, 2016
Much of the lecture material seemed very chopped-up from previous courses and did not flow well at all. In a couple of cases the assignment had very little relationship with the course material from the same week.
by Lukasz S•
Nov 25, 2016
Videos from previuos version of the course Reactive programming in Scala makes this course worse prepared. I had impression that it was made rushed from shredded pieces. Assignements are easier than previous
by Juan S P•
Nov 05, 2017
The lab for the third week was unrelated to the material, and the fourth week is a bunch of videos from the previous course of reactive programming in Scala. Nothing like the first course of Scala
by Viktor K•
Mar 04, 2017
Too much of the content is already contained in the courses "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" and "Principles of Reactive Programming". Would be nice to have some new assignments.
by Carlos M d C T•
Jul 30, 2017
The quality of the explanations is inferior to the first course.
But I feel I could pass the Assignments without mastery of the topics.
However, would take this course again.
by Evgenii S•
Aug 08, 2017
Course is not well formed.
I received full grade for second assignment doing nothing.
It will be great if you attach lectures from Reactive Programming at least as optional
by Viton V•
Oct 23, 2016
On the positive side: The content was very interesting.
On the negative side: The course was not particularly well structured. The last week was quite difficult to follow.
by Ivan K•
Apr 08, 2018
Last (4th week) is awfully designed, includes a lot of "scratch the surface" material, very bad explanations of futures and background. With authors redesigned 4th week.
by Pavel O•
Jan 21, 2020
Some stuff was weird, like the quickcheck task, too much weird syntax, hard to understand what's going on, especially because there was no explanation for binomial heap
by Oleg O•
Jun 23, 2017
Weird mix of disorganized materials. Manner of teaching of Erik Meijer is really annoying. Course "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" was much better
by Pascal S•
Nov 27, 2016
Learned quite a bit, but course was not as good as the first course of the specialization.
Especially the presentations in week 4 are rather messy.
by David P•
Jan 05, 2017
Thoroughly enjoyed the lectures by M. Odersky! Unfortunately the lectures on Futures seemed a bit disconnected from the rest of the material...
by Santiago S L•
Oct 12, 2018
Course is fine from an "standard" industry standpoint. However, I would have loved more monads and harder concepts related to category theory.
by Fernando G•
Jul 13, 2016
Interesting, but a little bit too easy and shallow.
The material was reused from other courses without making it all fit together well.
by Nathan L•
Oct 13, 2016
Was quite good but getting less and less useful, too abstract, lacking detail. Examples too academic, needs to be more practical.
by Alfonso M F•
Dec 19, 2016
Week 3 assigment had little relationship with the material presented in the course. Week 4 needs quite a lot of polish...
by Yuan L•
Feb 17, 2017
The last week has materials that nothing related to assignment, and it jumps a bit fast where i have no clue at all
by Nicolás C•
Jun 01, 2016
Most of the content was included in Functional Programming in Scala and Reactive Programming Principles in Scala.
by Bidhya N S•
Apr 02, 2019
The course is not structured well. Also concepts like monads and functors are not covered in detailed way.
by David S•
Dec 21, 2016
Meh. Very basic intro; not the more advanced class I anticipated, based on the first in the sequence.
by Damien F•
Dec 03, 2016
The videos were a bit confusing and gave me the impression that it was a patchwork from old lectures.
by Peter H•
Dec 31, 2018
Course material seems to be combined from two old courses, and some materials are not well prepared.
by Roger L•
Aug 09, 2017
The examples & exercises were too academic. Just glad to complete it. Found it extremely dull.
by Mayeul M•
Sep 05, 2016
Not as useful as the first course. The part on the futures is not really understandable.
by yassine a•
Nov 03, 2017
not bad , but very short and not huge plus value compared to first course