Aug 25, 2019
I learnt somerhing new by dz course, i was vry useful to us, thnq so much ,
Oct 24, 2017
Excellent information. Thank you for your recompilations and Time.
by Jonathan G•
Jun 03, 2016
Fascinating course but a little too much math for my taste.
by Jose M G A•
Mar 14, 2017
Very good Course!! Thank You.
by Jean-Luc G•
Jul 07, 2017
by William S•
Oct 19, 2019
The instructors are enthusiastic and it I like the research oriented perspective. However, the on-line course materials were not all organized and complete. For example, the quiz questions might pertain to information not yet covered. In addition, often it would take a lot of outside resources to figure out what was being covered. Improving the subtitles would be a big help. In spite, I was happy to have invested the time.
by Mohamed G M S•
Apr 26, 2016
before discussing genetic mutations occurred in Alzheimer disease that mentioned when discussing AIS, i think some refreshment about protein synthesis and the normal pattern that if disturbed by certain ways as mutations causes particular diseases.
some arrangements of material needed to prevent information overlapping
interesting courses, go on
thanks for your efforts dear professors
by Tamara L•
May 28, 2017
The teaching technique of using past research to explain how different molecular mechanisms at the synapse were discovered in order to understand their function is excellent. For an English speaking Westerner, however, the lectures were difficult to interpret and the transcripts were not helpful.
by Adriana V V•
Aug 02, 2016
So far the topics are very interesting but the accent of the teacher is sooo difficult to follow and distracts me! Also, she is looking down to read all the time and this doesn't reflect her knowledge.
Aug 23, 2019
Although the topics and course framework was interesting but i didn't like the instruction that much.
by Tracy W•
Jan 19, 2018
I enjoyed this course but found the male lecturer hard to understand.
by ELENA M•
Sep 17, 2017
I just finished THE INTRODUCTION TO PSYCHOLOGY -UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
Till now I can say that the professor from PEKING UNIVERSITY needs badly to improve her teaching skills.
- she does not speak with confidence
- no eye contact almost 99 % with the camera (we the students) - she is looking down in her laptop ... almost all the time
where is no slide in the right side, she is looking either left or right
there is no emotion, no excitement delivered by the professor
no examples about what she is presenting in context
no photo of historic people she is talking about - just lines and many words (F,J. GALL)
- images/ slides are passing very rapid
- instead of us looking to her standing (she can sit to be more comfortable for example) I would like to see the slided with information
she can see how to use BETTER the MOOC software for making these videos - she needs to take example from other teachers that have 4.5 + rating -
- she can use the example of professor STEVE JOORDANS - amazing style, charisma, way of explaining
- all these are CONSTRUCTIVE comments
- no comment for her English is just - the way she speaks is very difficult to follow - she is MONOTONE no pause no diction ... very hard to keep people interested
- the slides are not easy to download from THE OUTLOOK live with the credentials - this should be uploaded on COURSERA website
this is an example of others with the same issue:
- no ORIENTATION TO THE COURSE about link ressources
by Ishmael W•
Jul 19, 2019
I don't want to be mean to the instructor, but all she's doing is reading off of slides that should be downloadable without me having to send an email. Her accent is good, but the way she speaks is like nails scratching a chalkboard. Also, she's incredibly mono-toned which makes her speech dreadfully boring. She doesn't go into much depth - she just says "This thing here" and "this also here." I wish she'd just speak in her native language because I feel like that would be more helpful for the Mandarin students and I'd rather just read subtitles anyways. I hope another course related to neuroscience comes out onto here because I'm really interested in this subject and want an instructor that has a good presentation and goes further in depth than this one.
by Mike H•
Feb 16, 2017
I greatly enjoyed the material presented in this course and while I do not doubt the proficiency of it's creators the poor standard of spoken English of its two main presenters prevents me from recommending it to colleagues. As another reviewer has remarked, their English may be quite sufficient for day to day use with other experts but for inadequate for teaching students who are hearing many technical terms for the first time. The transcripts are no better and also contain many mistakes. I believe that this course should be stopped until these problems are corrected.
by Renaldas Z•
Jun 20, 2017
Course contains very interesting information, but presentation is problematic - if transcripts wouldn't contain that many mistakes, it would've been OK.
Course assumes that students have more knowledge of microbiology than neuro science.
At least for me beginning of this course was more interesting, than several last weeks.
May 02, 2016
Boring and can't make sense of the presentation / language and idiom use.
by HERAIZ-BEKKIS D•
Feb 27, 2017
The professor is reading long texts. It is not really attractive.
by Sara A•
Sep 03, 2017
Really hard to follow/understand the lessons.
by Paul K M•
Nov 07, 2017
by Dorothy H•
May 02, 2016
This course is useless and perhaps even harmful.
The professors would have done much better if they had taught the class in their native Chinese language and then got a really good translator to make subtitles in English.
I tried turning off the sound and just watching the presentation while reading the subtitles, but even this was so badly done in terms of language and presentation, that although I desperately wanted to take a course in advanced neurobiology, I felt that this course could actually destroy my love for the subject or teach me things that are incorrect because of language mistakes.
If you are not a native speaker of English then by all means steer even further clear as you will learn some very bad English habits and pronunciation.
I'm sure the profs' English ability is fine for collaborating with other professionals who already know the material, but teaching in English was a big mistake.
Again, I highly suggest they re-do the entire thing in Chinese and get really good translations and subtitles made and then I think it could be an awesome course. Now, as is, it would be truly foolish to take this course.
by J G•
Apr 10, 2017
This course is a discreditation to coursera, and it's low standards are appalling. From a purely certificate based perspective, the only requirement to complete the course are completely the quizzes. They are short, and can easily be googled, or the slides can be downloaded and the answers simply CRTL+F for keyboards. There is zero need to watch the lectures ( at least for the first 2 weeks).
The lectures are terrible themselves. The English is beyond horrible, and I don't understand the modern culture of having teachers teach in languages they can't speak. It is purely reading off the slides in any case, word for word. I learned more about the basics in neuroscience in a 20 minutes lecture from a separate course, "Computational Neuroscience" than the entire first week here.
If you actually want to learn neuroscience, check out HardvardX's intro course.
Mar 23, 2017
This is the worst, most pathetic course I have taken online. If Peking University believes this is their best - I'll not be taking another course with them. The instructor's command of the English language is awful and the sub-titles are some help, but not a lot. Instructors are just talking faces up front - they cannot teach. They may be great in the lab, but keep them out of the classroom. I toughed out the course, but it only got worse. I had originally signed up for parts 1 and 2 of this course. Canceled part 2. The use of slides that are not clear / too small and not on the screen long enough to digest the information did not help. Do yourself a favor - avoid this course. As a side note - I have taken in excess of 25 online courses, this was the most painful.
by Dani J•
Jun 11, 2019
I work with international students all day and have done for years, but this was painful to listen to. I really appreciate the effort made to present a course in another language, but I just couldn't follow along with this course. The obviously strained and slow pronunciation was so distracting. In addition, I couldn't make sense of even the simplest explanations as complex concepts were just referred to as "things" and "go like this" when we often could not see the accompanying hand gestures. The same thing has been explained in another course, and made sense right away. I highly advise anyone considering this course to take the course by either the University of Chicago or Duke University instead as I've tried them both out, and they are great.
by Deborah M•
May 22, 2016
After finishing week 1, I have decided to stick with Duke university's Medical neuroscience which is starting up again. I also highly recommend "Understanding the Brain The Neurobiology of Everyday Life" which I believe was taught by the University of Chicago. I found them to be far more engaging the viewer and the format to be much easier to follow. I found it visually disturbing and also have to keep pausing to read the slide before it switches.It's too bad because I was really looking forward to this course. It also seemed she had trouble pronouncing many of the words and I do not want to learn how to pronounce many of them incorrectly also many of the slides did not have an English translation on them.
by Phillip J U•
Apr 21, 2017
Extremely poor quality of instruction. The lectures themselves are little more than the material being read directly off the slides by an individual with a poor grasp on the English language. The majority of the slides are walls of unclear and non-descriptive text. Even with reading directly from the slides, the lecturer is overly circumstantial in her explanations if not just outright tangential. I commend the authors for putting together a course outside of their native language but, in this case at least, it does more harm than good.
In short, this course has the air of a group of first year students giving a presentation verbatim from the slides, as another commenter also mentioned below.
by Luis A•
Apr 05, 2016
Lots of good information, but the presentation is very bad. Not only are the professors clearly struggling with the English (and the material, calling anatomical planes "plates" and confounding sulci with fissures, etc), but some of the recording/video editing decisions make it less engaging and more difficult to follow. For example, the size of the images is often compromised because they chose to show the professor on the left side of the screen, even though it is absolutely unnecessary to do so.
Overall, I do not recommend this course.
by Mohamed M•
Dec 30, 2016
The professors sound like a group of first-year students presenting a group project, literally reading notes off of a powerpoint slide. The professors also can't speak English, so instead of explaining things in depth, they have to very, very slowly read basic phrases (to explain complex subject matter) off of what's basically a teleprompter.