Chevron Left
Reliable Google Cloud Infrastructure: Design and Process に戻る

Google Cloud による Reliable Google Cloud Infrastructure: Design and Process の受講者のレビューおよびフィードバック

4.7
6,934件の評価

コースについて

This course equips students to build highly reliable and efficient solutions on Google Cloud using proven design patterns. It is a continuation of the Architecting with Google Compute Engine or Architecting with Google Kubernetes Engine courses and assumes hands-on experience with the technologies covered in either of those courses. Through a combination of presentations, design activities, and hands-on labs, participants learn to define and balance business and technical requirements to design Google Cloud deployments that are highly reliable, highly available, secure, and cost-effective....

人気のレビュー

MB

2020年9月10日

Thanks Phillip! Excellent feed back after practice, always show new way how!

Really good material, is a real open door for a Google concepts! Is a way to start to thinking in Google Cloud Architect

RI

2019年8月27日

It was a wonderful course were I got to understand principles involved in business logic, determining youreaSLA, SLI and SLO and so many other design principles relevant for an end product scale.

フィルター:

Reliable Google Cloud Infrastructure: Design and Process: 676 - 691 / 691 レビュー

by Alvin P E

2018年10月30日

repeated labs and material more of deployment manager labs and notes which was already covered. very less of solution discussion. the whole course felt unnesccesary. mostly all covered direcly or indirecly in other course in the series. It would be great if the course had most common solutions like java jee spring/python djaogo production scale or serverles ETL end to end or datawarehouse analytics solution covering all design concpets of resilient high availaility etcc on such projects and covering labs for the same.

by Roman S

2019年11月13日

I have done a number of courses now and can tell that I do not enjoy the recordings with Jason Baker specifically.

The speaker rambles over slides, reading what the audience is reading anyway, examples are vague and not helpful, it is hard to get relevant knowledge from the lectures.

I like the other speaker Tom Terne, but he merely introduces to the lectures in a very nice and structured way.

In the long term, please consider rerecording the lectures on design process.

Thanks.

by Rafael C

2019年3月6日

There are multiple trainings that are absolutely useless for this level of individual. One is literally just signing in to Quiklabs and closing the project. How is that not just a waste of everyone's time. All the other labs include that step. Why even make that a lab. That is utterly stupid.

by fethi o

2019年1月6日

Although this course focuses on a deeper understanding of cloud architecting, the labs are repetitive in content and their coverage of the course contents are very low - Its pre-requisites (Architecting GCP courses) have been much better.

by LAGS

2020年3月23日

The instructor has a lot of knowledge about the subject but lacks about how to teach. It explains too fast, does not make any pause and makes hard to follow the slides.

by Jorge T

2020年4月27日

A repetition of other courses in the track, good for reinforcement however no new information is provided

by Aff H

2020年1月26日

This course is really important and detail. But the audio volume was low and inconsistent.

by David R

2020年3月26日

The experience with the labas could be improved a lot.

by Ting

2020年3月23日

Lab was completed but the system did not reflect that.

by William K

2021年3月7日

90% repeat of prior course content.

by David M

2019年5月25日

Worthless class for anyone who has experience as a software engineer or systems administrator. The labs are just making sure you can copy paste (since they don't want admins to learn how to code), and the only GCP-specific information is either advertising for Google or information we learned in previous lessons. I'm glad my company is paying me to do this, because otherwise it would've been a waste of my time.

by Daniel G

2020年2月24日

After completing other courses already, this course starts with an introduction to Qwikilabs!? Most of it is just boringly useless or obsolete as the lengthened videos are indicating

by Oleksandr G

2018年5月28日

Course gives very basic and obvious principles. It is better to review 4 example companies designs and why they was used in this course. Lab is a mess. container image obsolete.

by Marco M

2021年6月15日

Honestly, it is not the best , just a few labs , a lot of short videos of less than 30 seconds. You can do better google!

by Celine G

2022年6月13日

Facing lot of technical issue with Lab.

by Jorge Y M M

2020年10月13日

Good course