Thanks Phillip! Excellent feed back after practice, always show new way how!
Really good material, is a real open door for a Google concepts! Is a way to start to thinking in Google Cloud Architect
It was a wonderful course were I got to understand principles involved in business logic, determining youreaSLA, SLI and SLO and so many other design principles relevant for an end product scale.
by Alvin P E•
repeated labs and material more of deployment manager labs and notes which was already covered. very less of solution discussion. the whole course felt unnesccesary. mostly all covered direcly or indirecly in other course in the series. It would be great if the course had most common solutions like java jee spring/python djaogo production scale or serverles ETL end to end or datawarehouse analytics solution covering all design concpets of resilient high availaility etcc on such projects and covering labs for the same.
by Roman S•
I have done a number of courses now and can tell that I do not enjoy the recordings with Jason Baker specifically.
The speaker rambles over slides, reading what the audience is reading anyway, examples are vague and not helpful, it is hard to get relevant knowledge from the lectures.
I like the other speaker Tom Terne, but he merely introduces to the lectures in a very nice and structured way.
In the long term, please consider rerecording the lectures on design process.
by Rafael C•
There are multiple trainings that are absolutely useless for this level of individual. One is literally just signing in to Quiklabs and closing the project. How is that not just a waste of everyone's time. All the other labs include that step. Why even make that a lab. That is utterly stupid.
by fethi o•
Although this course focuses on a deeper understanding of cloud architecting, the labs are repetitive in content and their coverage of the course contents are very low - Its pre-requisites (Architecting GCP courses) have been much better.
The instructor has a lot of knowledge about the subject but lacks about how to teach. It explains too fast, does not make any pause and makes hard to follow the slides.
by Jorge T•
A repetition of other courses in the track, good for reinforcement however no new information is provided
by Aff H•
This course is really important and detail. But the audio volume was low and inconsistent.
by David R•
The experience with the labas could be improved a lot.
Lab was completed but the system did not reflect that.
by William K•
90% repeat of prior course content.
by David M•
Worthless class for anyone who has experience as a software engineer or systems administrator. The labs are just making sure you can copy paste (since they don't want admins to learn how to code), and the only GCP-specific information is either advertising for Google or information we learned in previous lessons. I'm glad my company is paying me to do this, because otherwise it would've been a waste of my time.
by Daniel G•
After completing other courses already, this course starts with an introduction to Qwikilabs!? Most of it is just boringly useless or obsolete as the lengthened videos are indicating
by Oleksandr G•
Course gives very basic and obvious principles. It is better to review 4 example companies designs and why they was used in this course. Lab is a mess. container image obsolete.
by Marco M•
Honestly, it is not the best , just a few labs , a lot of short videos of less than 30 seconds. You can do better google!
by Celine G•
Facing lot of technical issue with Lab.
by Jorge Y M M•