By Roman G
•Nov 30, 2022
There are some inaccuracy in quizes. Lab works contain things to fix that aren't related to the GPU/CUDA so it distracts from the main course. But from the other side it gives you the feeling of the real world development process, when you can spend an hour searching for freaking space symbol forgotten by your colleague in a wrong place
I'd be glad to see more strict tests in practice jobs. I mean that the grader should check runtime of the code instead of the runtime artifacts
In general I'm satisfied with the course: I got new and refreshed old knowledge in the field of CUDA programming
By Raffy B M F
•Apr 30, 2023
The instructor uses a very slow way of presentation with a very unattractive voice. He can work on having better lecturing skills
By Leander R
•Oct 8, 2023
Assignments are badly defined, almost everyone doing this course is clueless. The lectures are mediocre. Not sure what I learnt from this course, not much GPU programming.
By Yukihiro F
•Mar 6, 2023
前のコースと同じくクオリティは最低レベル。
さらに最悪なことに、Finalプロジェクトがピアレビュー課題になっています。
おそらくここにたどり着くまでに大半が脱落しているため、採点されるまでにどれだけ時間がかかるか分かりません。
ちなみにコース4の最後もピアレビュー課題です。