It was the hardest, but best course so far. Surely, it will be very useful to apply in any context. It gives one satisfaction to better understand leaders, organizations, and what could be better.
I thoroughly enjoyed this course, as it helped me understand the corporate world better and how organizations are designed. I found it explained the company I work for very well.
by Vikash P•
The course lacks coherence which comes as a big disappointment as it follows two excellent modules by Greg Northcraft.
by Jeff C•
A little too much theory and not enough in applied day-to-day situations that managers will face.
by Tom W•
OK course. Difficult to follow at times. The assignments and reading make it worth taking.
I didn't find the peer review assignments helpful. Overall, the lectures were adequate.
by David B•
Interesting course but i have the feeling it goes less deep than previous modules
by Baoliang L•
more detailed case studies would be better to understand the course contents
by Rishika G•
I found the course very generic and could not meet my expectations.
by PABLO F C E•
Could be a little more interactive with more suggested readings.
by Syed A A•
I did not find this course relatable to the Specialization.
by Димитрије Ј•
Interesting case studies, but very uninteresting professor.
by Angela G H•
I found this course too high level to keep my interest.
by Michael H S•
Interesting look at org. management.
by Jeson M•
The course is very informative and has a lot of content. However, the professor's speech has too many distracting pauses. It's hard to keep my eyes open while watching the videos. To reduce the pauses, he should write down his lectures as transcript first, since they are recorded.
by kallol C•
The Course was good. However I cannot down load my certificate. PLEASE HELP
by James S•
Hard to follow the instructor. The lessons taught were applicable.
by Vikram K•
As I said for the foundation course of this specialization also, the course framework and reading materials are OK. The reason for a 1 star rating is the design of the evaluation system. There are too many peer-graded assignments with subjective answers giving chance to overly-competitive participants to downgrade assignments unnecessarily. But this is not all, there are so many many plagiarised or blank submissions that it is difficult to find the required number of assigments to rate.
The flagging of plagiarised or irrelevant submissions are not even attented to. This causes loss of motivation to complete the course. I would suggest to evolve the evaluation system as I believe the aim should be that the participants get to learn something and not get demotivated to even complete the specialization.