Chevron Left
シーケンスモデル に戻る

deeplearning.ai による シーケンスモデル の受講者のレビューおよびフィードバック

4.8
27,686件の評価
3,306件のレビュー

コースについて

In the fifth course of the Deep Learning Specialization, you will become familiar with sequence models and their exciting applications such as speech recognition, music synthesis, chatbots, machine translation, natural language processing (NLP), and more. By the end, you will be able to build and train Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and commonly-used variants such as GRUs and LSTMs; apply RNNs to Character-level Language Modeling; gain experience with natural language processing and Word Embeddings; and use HuggingFace tokenizers and transformer models to solve different NLP tasks such as NER and Question Answering. The Deep Learning Specialization is a foundational program that will help you understand the capabilities, challenges, and consequences of deep learning and prepare you to participate in the development of leading-edge AI technology. It provides a pathway for you to take the definitive step in the world of AI by helping you gain the knowledge and skills to level up your career....

人気のレビュー

WK

2018年3月13日

I was really happy because I could learn deep learning from Andrew Ng.\n\nThe lectures were fantastic and amazing.\n\nI was able to catch really important concepts of sequence models.\n\nThanks a lot!

JY

2018年10月29日

The lectures covers lots of SOTA deep learning algorithms and the lectures are well-designed and easy to understand. The programming assignment is really good to enhance the understanding of lectures.

フィルター:

シーケンスモデル: 3251 - 3275 / 3,307 レビュー

by Wynne E

2018年3月14日

Keras is a ball-ache.

by Monhanmod K

2019年3月17日

too hard

by CARLOS G G

2018年7月26日

good

by Debayan C

2019年8月23日

As a course i think this was way too fast and also way too assumptive. I wish the instructions were a bit slow and we broke down more into designing bilstms and how they work and more simple programming excercises. As a whole i think 1 full week of material is missing from this course which would concentrate on the basic RNN building for GRUs and LSTMs and then move on to applications. I usually do not review these courses and they are pretty standard but this course left me wanting and i will consult youtube and free repos to learn about it better. I did not gain confidence on my understanding. Barely scraped through the assignments after group study and consulting people who know this stuff (which defeats the purpose of this course i believe. It is to enable me with concrete understanding and ability to build these models . It shouldn't lead me to consult others and clear out doubts .)

by 象道

2019年9月16日

i really learned from this course some ideas on recurrent neural net, but the assignments of this course are not completely ready for learners and are full of mistakes which have existed for more than a year. those mistakes in the assignments mislead learners pretty much if they do not study some discussion threads of the forum. this course has the lowest quality among all of Dr. Andrew Ng's. before the updated versions, a learner had better have a look at the assignments discussion forum before starting the assignments.

by Luke J

2021年3月31日

The material really is great, but work needs to be done to improve the assignments, specifically submission and grading. On the last assignment I spent way more time troubleshooting the grader than the content of the assignment. It can be very frustrating to have to do this on a MOOC where no human support is available. It appears, specifically for this assignment based on discussion that this has been a problem for a very long time.

by daniele r

2019年7月15日

The subject is fascinating, the instructor is undoubtly competent, but there is a strong feeling of lower quality with respect to the other 4 courses in the Spec (in particular the first 3). Many things in this course are only hinted to, without many details. Man things are just said but not really explained. Many recording errors as well. Maybe another week could have helped in having a little more depth in the subject

by Amir M

2018年9月2日

Although the course lectures are great, as are all the lectures in this specialization, some of the assignments have rough edges that need to be smoothed out. It is particularly frustrating for those trying to work on the optional/ungraded programming assignment sections that have some incorrect comparison values, as much time will be wasted trying to figure out the source of the error.

by David S

2020年12月19日

Excellent lectures, terrible exercise material. E.g. "You're implementing how to train a model! But we've done the actual training for you already! Your exercise is to add numbers A and B! Number A is 4. Number B is 11! Enter A + B in the box below!" Also, someone did a search-and-replace and converted every sentence into an individual bullet point to reduce readability.

by Sergio F

2019年5月16日

Unfortunately, this course is the less valuable in the specialization. Programming assignment very interesting but no introduction to Keras. To pass the assignments, forum support has been vital. I also found lectures not clear even to the point that to catch some concepts you have to google around for more resources. Unfortunately, I could not suggest this course.

by Guruprasad K

2022年3月9日

Compared to the other courses in the specialization, this appears to lack depth and clarity one could expect. LSTMs and GRUs are somewhat out-dated now, given the speed of innovation in the field, and Transformers are here to stay (for now). Unfortunately, Transformers are very poorly covered.

by Peter B

2018年2月20日

Getting the input parameters correct for the Keras assignments is on par with the satisfaction of dropping a ring, contact lens, or an expensive object into the sink, and spending an hour looking for it inside the disassembled pipes, through built up hair debris and molded dirt.

by SARAVANAN N

2018年3月19日

Overall a great course, thanks to Andrew NG for his great explanations. But a very bad support, I faced many issues in submitting the assignment due to technical issues (notebook not saving) but no dedicated resource to help me. I spend lot of time in resolving my self.

by Sergei S

2019年5月18日

Feels again like authors tried to put everything into just a couple of weeks, thus the course turned out to be messy with lots of details hidden. Even though there was a lot to learn, I am still not sure if I understand correctly how to build a simple sequence model.

by Clement A

2020年8月7日

Really good to understand the basics, however, it doesn't use the latest TF2 and the exercises are either trivial because too much pre-worked, or too hard because it doesn't give the information required to succeed.

This course really needs to be updated.

by Mladen M

2020年7月9日

Programming assignment instructions are not well written (clear), and as a result it is easy to get stuck on something of little relevance to deep learning. Also, I would suggest that you make the lecture notes in written format available.

by Chris M

2019年8月21日

The lectures cover the basic design of the models but don't help teaching you how to actually use them. I learned more by reading blogs to get the programming assignments to work then this course.

by Ashley H

2018年9月14日

Lectures/Videos were excellent, the assignments were very poor (loads of errors in the code not corrected over 7 months since the course went live)

by yuvaraj

2020年12月11日

The course videos were very lengthy and difficult to follow. Many topics discussed in course video were not part of programming assignment

by Simeon S

2020年3月18日

Good introduction to the concepts. Really poor quality videos and exercises. Very frustrating when working on the assignments.

by David L

2020年6月28日

Good lectures. Programming assignments are useless fill-in-the-blank exercises, you don't really learn much from them.

by Thomas A

2019年10月10日

The programming assignments really are like pulling teeth. There's not really enough guidance leading up to them.

by Mark

2018年10月24日

The course videos and the programming assignments were lacking. And there was no support in the forums.

by Jeffrey S

2018年6月2日

Spent more time trying to work around a buggy grader than learning the underlying concepts.

by Frank T

2019年10月23日

Too hard to understand compared to the previous coursed in this specification.