Google Cloud による Securing and Integrating Components of your Application の受講者のレビューおよびフィードバック
コースについて
人気のレビュー
I gained vast amounts of orientation and skills in this course.\n\nThe course content and the course administrators were really great and helped convey good understanding.\n\nThank you :)
Easy to follow and quite applicable information is taught without too many difficult technical words and lists. I felt that I could implement or help others implement these applications.
Securing and Integrating Components of your Application： 101 - 121 / 121 レビュー
by Paul H
•The content in the course was really good. The Qwiklabs have gotten out of date and were a little frustrating to complete (had to talk with Qwiklabs support on two of them in order to complete due to issues with the lab).
by Juan P
•Labs are good but the material is a bit out of date. For example, class indicates that cloud functions need to be written in Nodejs. However, nowadays, you can write them in nodejs, python and go.
by David W
•Similar to other courses in the series, there is a lot of speed-reading of slides and a few useful exercises from the public github learning repo. Helps structure the approach to what you learn.
by Paul C
•a good summary of IAM, cloud pub/sub, cloud functions and APIs, with interactivity via qwiklabs. Not the most engaging of presentations, but I did learn from it.
by Kaoru K
•The security part of the course was pretty confusing to me. The Cloud Pub/Sub and Cloud Functions parts were excellent.
by Jonathan L V
•Existían comandos de laboratorio que estaban desactualizados y no funcionaban a la perfección.
by Labib T
•The quicklabs dont follow, always in unfinished state even if finished.
by Przemek
•Presenters are not engaged what they are saying.
by Jorge I G P
•Some labs are unclear and some also have errors
by Madhu C
•scripts failed some times
by Abhishek P
•Need from disucssion
by Arnab C
•Average content, mostly read out frog GCP documentation. Trainers presentations are not interesting, very rarely any value add i.e. interesting case studies, trade offs etc. are discussed. The Lab is full of errors. I had raised a number of them with Quicklab. The lab codes are not well organised, instructions are not clear at many places. It wasted hours of mine. I would like Coursera to make refund. Honestly, was expecting much quality from Coursera given my earlier experiences were really good.
by Sanketh S
•Needs better hands on labs and quizes. tighter learning feedback loops. Need to use exponential memory markers better.
by Piyush P
•would rate it very low because of less information on the course.
by Horacio I P H
•I think should be more clear and use other languages like Java
by Landry L
•Many errors in lab
by James O
•Awful - avoid. You get a lot of information but little hands on. When the hands on does take place, you are using preexisting files and constructs. Fine until you think well now I want to build my own thing. Where do you start? No clue. This does not help you get there. Avoid. Total rip off from Google and Coursera
by Aditya G
•1 star because one of the instructor speaks too fast without proper pauses and feels like rushing the course videos. Not happy at all.
by Mcolisi B
•Some lab have issues and the team concern is not fixing , for e.g App Dev - Deploying an API for the Quiz Application: Node.js
by Siarhei K
•Super easy quizes. Very low quality course & certificate.
by N V
•Sub standard!
Coursera Footer
