D
2019年12月18日
I gained vast amounts of orientation and skills in this course.\n\nThe course content and the course administrators were really great and helped convey good understanding.\n\nThank you :)
JJ
2018年3月26日
Easy to follow and quite applicable information is taught without too many difficult technical words and lists. I felt that I could implement or help others implement these applications.
by zbigniew l
•2020年1月12日
could be better, i am java fan, and want to use endpoints in java. i will not create an endpoint in angularjs in cloud, to access endpoint in java just to have authentication.
You should include java endpoints in the course.
by Paul H
•2020年2月17日
The content in the course was really good. The Qwiklabs have gotten out of date and were a little frustrating to complete (had to talk with Qwiklabs support on two of them in order to complete due to issues with the lab).
by Juan P
•2020年1月12日
Labs are good but the material is a bit out of date. For example, class indicates that cloud functions need to be written in Nodejs. However, nowadays, you can write them in nodejs, python and go.
by David W
•2019年10月4日
Similar to other courses in the series, there is a lot of speed-reading of slides and a few useful exercises from the public github learning repo. Helps structure the approach to what you learn.
by Paul C
•2020年6月11日
a good summary of IAM, cloud pub/sub, cloud functions and APIs, with interactivity via qwiklabs. Not the most engaging of presentations, but I did learn from it.
by Kaoru K
•2019年3月3日
The security part of the course was pretty confusing to me. The Cloud Pub/Sub and Cloud Functions parts were excellent.
by Jonathan L V
•2019年4月30日
Existían comandos de laboratorio que estaban desactualizados y no funcionaban a la perfección.
by Labib T
•2019年4月17日
The quicklabs dont follow, always in unfinished state even if finished.
by Przemek
•2019年10月4日
Presenters are not engaged what they are saying.
by Jorge I G P
•2020年4月21日
Some labs are unclear and some also have errors
by Madhu C
•2020年4月15日
scripts failed some times
by Abhishek P
•2020年4月7日
Need from disucssion
by Arnab C
•2020年7月31日
Average content, mostly read out frog GCP documentation. Trainers presentations are not interesting, very rarely any value add i.e. interesting case studies, trade offs etc. are discussed. The Lab is full of errors. I had raised a number of them with Quicklab. The lab codes are not well organised, instructions are not clear at many places. It wasted hours of mine. I would like Coursera to make refund. Honestly, was expecting much quality from Coursera given my earlier experiences were really good.
by Sanketh S
•2019年7月23日
Needs better hands on labs and quizes. tighter learning feedback loops. Need to use exponential memory markers better.
by Piyush P
•2018年9月3日
would rate it very low because of less information on the course.
by Horacio I P H
•2019年7月10日
I think should be more clear and use other languages like Java
by Landry L
•2019年3月10日
Many errors in lab
by James O
•2021年5月17日
Awful - avoid. You get a lot of information but little hands on. When the hands on does take place, you are using preexisting files and constructs. Fine until you think well now I want to build my own thing. Where do you start? No clue. This does not help you get there. Avoid. Total rip off from Google and Coursera
by Aditya G
•2019年2月14日
1 star because one of the instructor speaks too fast without proper pauses and feels like rushing the course videos. Not happy at all.
by Mcolisi B
•2020年7月28日
Some lab have issues and the team concern is not fixing , for e.g App Dev - Deploying an API for the Quiz Application: Node.js
by anuragKoka
•2022年5月31日
will not be using coursera again. why I have to buy courses which I have completed already.
by Siarhei K
•2017年12月2日
Super easy quizes. Very low quality course & certificate.
by NIEL V
•2018年10月30日
Sub standard!