I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysys and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
I learned so many things in this module. I learned that how to do error analysis and different kind of the learning techniques. Thanks Professor Andrew Ng to provide such a valuable and updated stuff.
by Kevin Q•
lot of issues with assignments and ambiguous quiz questions this time around, not as polished as other Andrew courses
by Arghya R•
Could have more case studies and above all. Also programing assignments on self driving car could have been better
by Okhtay A•
A bit too free form compared to the other courses in deep learning specialization, but maybe that was the goal.
by Masih B•
This course could be way more better, if it also focused on codeing with tensorflow (like the previous course)
by Janet C•
Overview of the machine learning process. No projects or sample code to actually organize the ideas into code.
by Aniruddh B•
Very nice, but I don't believe the content merits a full course. It could be integrated with courses 1 and 2.
To much talk but understandable. Need something like programming examples with different data distributions.
by Rob W•
Seemed to be information that could have been included in another course rather than its own 2 week course.
by Idan P•
Lectures can be summed up by: "use common sense".
Quiz can be summed up by "to pass, use OUR common sense".
by Abd-Elrahman B•
The quiz questions are quite confusing and some of them are not consistent with the content of the videos.
by Rishabh B•
Slightly repetitive from previous courses. Could have been integrated with the future or previous course.
by Barnoviciu E•
Filled like it could be condensed in a lot less, probably a filler to fill the 5 courses "requirement??"
by Tim U•
More quizzes or scenario-based examples or exercises at the end in coding. This felt thin in content.
by Iam P d S•
This course was shorter and didn't have any programming assignments. Could've been part of course 2.
by Aswin R•
Didn't turn out to be much useful. Could've added more content or added as a part of other courses.
by Yue E•
Unfortunately, it did not match with my expectations, too much theory and no programming exercises.
by Isaraparb L•
The early part rather feels slow and repetitive. The course's content seems very important though.
by MEKALA S N•
The videos are too lengthy, getting bored while watching them.Better reduce the length of videos.
by Vladislav Z•
Have mixed feeling about this one.
It is more like one week course - to few materials for 2 week.
by Thomas B•
It would have been really nice to have some project work on this one instead of just quizzes.
by Shivam K S•
Could have been more in depth or could have been added to another course as one extra week
by Gowdhaman S•
The course content was great and it is more theoretical. Kindly add hands-on or projects.
by Joseph D•
Helpful guidance but I didn't get enough material to help *me* generalize what I learned.
by Deleted A•
Some material is trivial. Some quiz questions are ambiguous, or have nonsensical answers.
by Vitor A B•
There's no programming exercises.
Pehaps one for hyper parameter tuning would be nice.